Most AI engagements fail in the shape of the contract, not the shape of the technology. We do it in reverse.
Most AI engagements fail in the shape of the contract, not the shape of the technology. A vendor pitches transformation, the buyer signs a six-month proposal based on a slide deck, and everyone discovers the real problem somewhere around month three. We do it in reverse: a short, fixed-fee scoping sprint that produces a working pilot and a written plan, before anyone commits to a bigger engagement.
This page describes how that works — start to finish, honestly.
A scoping sprint is two weeks. Fixed scope, fixed fee, fixed end date. Our founding engineers pair with one or two of your people — usually a product or ops lead plus whoever holds the P&L for the workflow we're looking at. We ask for around four hours a week of your time — not for you to do build work, but to iterate with us on what's in your head. Scoping sprints are how we close the gap between your mental model and something deployable; that gap only shrinks when you're in the conversations. Mostly short working sessions, plus access to one real workflow we can actually dig into.
What you get at the end of the two weeks:
We price the sprint as a fixed fee because we think proposal-based pricing warps incentives on both sides. A fixed fee means we're paid to produce the output, not to run down the clock. It also means you can say no to the next stage without feeling like you've wasted a procurement cycle.
The numbers live in the commercial conversation, not on a page. If you want a sense of the shape, 15 minutes with the team is usually enough.
Scoping → production pilot → full deployment → steady-state support. You can stop at any handover, and we design the sprint so stopping is a real option, not a threat.
The handover between scoping and delivery is a single document and a single conversation. Same engineers, same product, same governance boundary — continuity is the point.
Governance is the reason we exist and the thing most AI pitches skip. Concretely, it means four things:
Governance should be invisible when everything is working and obvious the moment something isn't. That's the bar.
Our beachhead is specialty insurance — carriers, brokers, Lloyd's-market infrastructure — because regulation is the hard part and we've made it easy. That expertise earns us the right to operate in adjacent regulated industries as we expand.
We're also building a small-and-medium-business offering — the same operating-system spine, shaped for firms our own size. Enterprise-grade governance, audit trail, and workflow automation at a price a small business can actually adopt. Agents connecting to the tools SMBs already run: HubSpot, Xero, the Microsoft 365 stack, bespoke applications, and the traditional systems nobody talks about on stage but everyone still runs on (DB2, SQL Server, Databricks). The technology is the same; the packaging is different.
If you run a firm that's too small for a Big-Four rollout but too serious to ignore governance, keep an ear out — this track is shaping up for you.
When you engage us, the people scoping the work are the people building it — three founders plus advisors, amplified by the same agent mesh we sell our clients. We don't stack juniors between you and the person making decisions; agents do the work that doesn't need human judgement (integration boilerplate, documentation, compliance housekeeping), humans do the work that does. That's the point of governed AI done right — it compounds the team, not replaces it.
Capacity scales with the architecture, not with headcount. That's by design, not by accident.
We'd rather ship a small thing that works than a big thing that might. Starting with one workflow, one team, one measurable outcome means you can actually tell whether AI is helping — and why. Once one thing is running cleanly, overlaying the next is faster, cheaper, and the governance surface you've already built carries over. The cost is front-loaded; the value compounds.
New use cases layer on the same spine instead of starting fresh each time. That's the advantage of a platform approach over a project approach — each engagement leaves behind infrastructure the next one can use.
If this shape sounds right, the next step is a 15-minute call with the team. No slides, no pre-read, just a conversation about whether there's a real problem here we can usefully help with. If we can't help, we'll say so and — where we can — point you at someone who can.
Book it here, or drop a note to hello@synapsedx.ai.